Datagram:Hormuz, Iran, Complexity
Posted on:230526
Author:m.
References:Iran,Hormuz,Bitcoin,energy,currency
A zero sum game: and not a minor one, Iran comes out of this as an autonomous player on the global scene. That then can be engaged as an Equal “entre Pares” by China, Russia(as a nation state that is infested historically with the cross-pollination of Supra National Entities), and the US(alas “Trump” as an actor, as a non-agent, alas directed by Supra National mostly Western-Finance-Corporative Entities that hide their proper enacting, hide the individuals that have a say in the shadows, play out the equivalent of the “hidden city”, as real power always implies, as real power always abuses of proxies, the ultimate proxy being the public, the non agentic collectives).
The first stage of this “war” went unnoticed: Iran as much built up as an underdog military sovereignty, not yielding to the “US”, NOR to Russia and/or China. This must have been an herculean feat, they succeeded as of today. Can they hold on to this foundation in the middle and long term? Their mere importance if any resides here. What Iran is bartering for, is their independent, autonomous interests, not those of China, Russia or the other players mentioned. A unique case of dare.
The in the public domain parlay of negotiations is proving the US as a party, is it?! This is fundamentally wrong, this is an original multi-party negotiation in which the US nation/political/military entity is a minor player. Considering this a one on one, be it zero-sum, which it is, will veil any logic, even in the short term. Clowns as Trump adding a layer of bluff, and only bluff, makes it digestible theatre but takes completely away the clue of the matter.
BTC’s –bitcoin first ascension in it’s ambiguous role model for central digital currencies, the new tax-haven, off-shore wealth storage, two-tier use by power-elites, a currency that can interact with the real assets of our current planet: gold, energy resources, necessary resources to complex end products, the flow of those, the currency to express, and settle. Note: these variables each above have their distinct meaning in the line-up. In this Iran had no choice, they went for second best, their gold reserves could probably not back their agency. A consequential choice, BTC only having till now played a role as a tool of settlement between elite insiders, to settle matters between each other, transfer corruption(Ukraine), a layer of masking, not needing “partners” in greed to trust one another. And was thus kept alive, was co opted in the West. Iran did one better, to settle contracts, using multisig, incorporate “smart transactions”, transactions in short including data that can be pertinent to the transaction, and using BTC as a settlement denominator, directly in equity markets of energy. The use as a currency, affecting even the smallest “BTC in own custody owner”. The historical scope: there was planned meditation, a strategy behind “nuclear power” and “mining btc”. Note of caution: we know little or nothing of the details, all this is based on circumferential evidence.
The enlightening construe that an underdog, be it a nation, and it’s admittedly advantaged location on the map, in time, can break up established bickering between the known players is magnanimous. It breaks a static world-view. Iran is an entity, an homogeneous whole of crack values, management, mental strength, a definition as to the distinction between complexity as to chaos. Iran is the incorporation of supra national values, long term views(proven by their last fifty year history for one), enlightenment, no bluff entity, extending beyond the concept of what goes for nation. The end result is by imposition of uncontrollable variables fragile, one has to pinch one-self to believe the reality they single-handedly impose. The last try, was it Kadhafi?
We little by little see a built up to “No player on the global scene can hide in “neutrality”, the limits of complexity versus autonomy, the fragility of complexity, and in the end the consideration finally that the main factor to tweak global stability is factoring population(s). To get to a “stable”, concurrent, homogeneous world of sorts, might well take till the end of the century. The macro elements of inertia –within the elite decision makers as much–, the improvisations that go inside the power structures that behold autonomy, the focus on “as we go”, as for China the “nothing new at the table(kindling the fire of industry and trade, consumption, exporting pollution was seen before)”. Regardless, this panhandling will lead to the ultimate core of problems and solutions, being –population factoring– –end of century timelines– both being out of scope of this datagram but visible indicators as the “Hormuz situation” are leads to this type of scenarios.
The above with the grain of “non-exhaustively” a listing.
Datagram: Of pertinence, doxing(in the right sense of the word)
Posted on:210526
Author:m.
References: Simon_Dixon, Catherine_Austin_Fitts, cancelation, corruption, timestamps
Both Katherine Austin Fitts, Simon Dixon are gathering steam, –a certain fractionary part of the public where their logic is comprehensible, but large enough a fraction of an audience, since it is rooted as an annex to the conventional system, capture their analysis – need to be classified as “Heritage Sites”. They need to be protected and insulated, from retribution. The likeliness that something “happens”(cancelation, corruption, physical) to them is pertinent.
As starters: redundancy, id-keys, hashes of their content, i2p, independence of platforms, bittorrents, serious timestamping to not have them disappeared by the algos of Youtube, etc. … Such individuals heading ‘think-tanks’ in the real sense need whisle-blowers(real data, not the public domain accessibility of slop to base their analysis upon), independence of publishing forms, and physical save-havens(Fitts hovers between the U.S. and the Netherlands which leaves her ultimately the choice in being neutered or silenced). It is not that Julian Assange, the examplary case study, should be forgotten.
A big todo for them: their “doxing”(not by conventional definition as the one practiced for “nazi”) –pointing to the individuals by name behind the scenes, of real policy importance– is a serious concern to be addressed by both S.D. and C.A.F. It is the names of physical persons that hide behind the screens(willingly dressed up primarily for that purpose), terminology, of institutions, corporations and banking entities, that matters, makes them vulnerable to scrutiny –know your enemy–. Both S.D. and C.A.F. fail in this regard –probably for reasons of “can do”– in this regard.
They have a right to being financed, having credence, being referenced as original sources of intellectual wealth. S.D. leads the way in explicitely refusing to “monetize” his channels –to be translated into survival or greed at the other end–.
I could be wrong on the above, at any moment they might impose a change of status, as of today they are the ones that make sense, trim their variables, have an historic lead, dare to predict future scenarios, game and iterate their own scenarios.
“–”, since this has become a trademark of the use for AI, rest assured not the case above,
Datagram: Influencers, alt-media
Posted on:190526
Author:m.
References: alt-media influencers
Simon Dixon champions a more extensive ream of variables, offers no solutions, just path-ways, different individual and collective behavioral patterns very much considering the human psychology, the general IQ level of the audience(keeping accessibility high), not proning bitcoin as the magical solution.
Catherine Austin Fitts, outspoken on the core issues. Finance, currency, the power-circles.
These individuals seem also to be publishing ‘real’ content, belonging to what matters, the meta structure of global society.The medium and long term. They openly state the obvious: who has, who has not agency.
To see what they come up with concerning the sell-out, the parity, the transfer, of wealth sharing with China and Russia(Russia through Putin’s personal interests, a Jewish oligarchy mostly was already permeable to Western interests) of the Western supra-national players.
Datagram: Population as a factor of economics/politics/military finance
Posted on:160526
Author:m.
References: population, population_density, migrations
It is done as such through history …in a primitive way. Soldiers for war, kids and preferably sons for agriculture, work-forces for industry. More recently by induced migrations, providing gate-ways for it, then politicising immigrants for political short term purpose. All of these ways of weaponizing were rather …yes primitive.
There are changing variable values, recently(over the last half century), robotisation, the trade off between derivatives and net value augmentation, the derivatives of any kind of growth being physically unsustainable and stress creating.
These phenomena have begun to be understood by elements within the power structures, some of the ones with agency, so yes, depopulation is subject of consideration.
Two tier societies, everywhere on the globe, better tools in the hands of the agentic tops of societies locally make it possible to experiment, intensify experimenting. The “Covid” experiment was quite revealing as to such. I consider the Ukraine experiment and the Hormuz situation rather manoeuvring(both have a theatrical element) in the “Quest for what is left” by more conventional means. This point rather to a more conventional(primitive) approach as to energy, flows of energy(energy gate-ways), and the currency in which energy is traded. On top, within the societal tissue, porn and drugs, any decadence is in firm hands in parallel.
Is this a good thing, or a bad thing? Depends of one’s position within society. I suggest that the opinion of the agents within the powers that be will prevail. It is mostly a question of how nimble they are.
Datagram:“The Quest for what is left”
Posted on:120526
Author:m.
References: Alt-media, Simon Dixon, Brian Berletic, proxies, agency, actors
The alt-media as much as the conventional media have all several preposits that make any analysis impossible. All give me the impression to rely on public data(“Says this, says that), graphs and data-reams(in the public domain).
The podcast ones, the envied rail on which to bet, to “monetize”, have interviewers asking questions that are out of focus, lack any concept of oversight, weight the few variables they apply by “huge”, and interviewies that keep hammering on the same established decoys(Trump, US(not as a proxy for supra-national powers), Israel(neither as a proxy for supra-national corporations, finance “institutes”, complexes englobed inside their sfere) At the top the sovereign wealth funds, that can shift inflationary “wealth” in and out of the sfere of influence of a single nation. In all actors and “no-agency at all” in suits seem to get their podium. …And that one a regular base, some multiple times a day, as if news is driven by minute time-lines, rather than the emotional clock at state of the listener, the algorithm that demands a new soundbite to cope with one’s “work”, the “making a living” of the one-man, small team for the lucky “hosts”, producing “shows”. And shows they are indeed.
That is not the only thing wrong with the systemics of the alt-media, the youtube algorithm, the emotional stupor of the ‘educated’ general public –including the “middle class” –including generational distinctions, –not to speak about the completely abject “left-right”, the moral and ethical issues decried while these are totally absent from the drivers and shakers of the quest for preservation of power in the short term. Moral and ethical considerations should be important, they belong into the category of long-term objectives, should be part of the “quality of desire” of the elites. They are not, hence “If one does not survive the day, then what good is it to be right tomorrow”. And the Putin one –not literally, i do not speak Russian “In a world where there is no place for Russia, that world does not need to exist”, to justify his stance on nuclear issues.
Are there nuances, differences in style of our “Global leaders”? Indeed there are, and it is charming to think of Xi and Putin as more clear-headed and logical actors. In essence, push come to shove, …more of the short term, bartering for percentages, in control, and survival. There is no grand plan to face the next century, think –China: the next five years, nothing new to the table.
As a fait-divers, anybody over the last years mentioning the catastrophic impact of war …on the environment?
There is no end to the prepositions that are wrong by design, at least if one is to overview, understand and eventually predict any outcomes.
At the base layer there is the vocabulary –nebulous at best. At the base there is the youtube algorithm, holding the “producer” and the “consumer” in an iron grip.
Where to begin?! Beats me.
In the mean time, create crisis, and profit, every-one according to his needs, –Trump, –Putin, –Zelenski, …did i forget dozens of politicians and Ursulas? …and the big ones the finance and corporate structures that hide the real men in power.
Datagram:Media on,
Posted on:180426
Author:m.
References: Alt-media, Simon Dixon, Iran, China, US, ‘sovereign wealthfunds’
Mainly two, a combination of two drivers: the ethical-moral whiners(the elites anywhere in the world can’t care less for human rights), and the “Nation-state’rs”. Within the establishment mindframe of “war”. So 99% of there scenarios resemble a boxing context. “Bob en weave” when wrong, and “i said so” when a minute fraction of any event goes their way.
A notable exception(apart from his try-hard to court an audience –there is little of such interest for in depth analysis) is Simon Dixon. His scenario on a reset in action(Ukraine and Iran “wars” on the military side) is a probable one. He got his systemics right, takes care to develop a concise vocabulary with definite meaning over time. His quantifications that must be at the basis of his hunches, they must cost him a lot of work. After all he operates on intentionally deceitful data as all of us do.
Either he is somehow “covered & hedged”, or he runs the risk of being canceled, yes terminated. The reason he is able to present his researched views is probably that they are above the fray and touch an insignificant part of the public. The other one of course is he being a sleeper agent to guide and direct opinion when needed in the future, when called upon by his masters. That is always a possibility at every step of the traject. Hence Julian Assange, completely trashed, a shadow of his former self, no come-back there.
Worth looking into his latest predictions on the Middle East @ https://simondixon.com/blog/real-agenda-…
Datagram:Mindframes
Posted on:140426
Author:m.
References: Presidents, Nation states, territory, globalism
We would do well to refactor the terminology to meaning of most of the geo-political language, the diplomatic language. To reconsider the meaning versus suggestive meaning of the terminology used. At a lower level: to redefine what are the variables in international affairs to be: “supra-national corporations”?!, “autonomy”, prepositioned importance of presidents and nation states.
Datagram:What is Gilbert Doctorow about
Posted on:110326
Author:m.
References: Iran, Israel, Europe, US
Is it territory, political fractions, culture, religion, corporations, few global clans that dominate the next moves. How good are they in the long term?
Datagram:Pertinent-spot-on,constellation,politunistisch
Posted:Thu,04.12.2025
Author:m.
Keywords:Bart de Wever,Ursula von der Leyen,predictability
Links:https://archive.ph/jnSQC
Bart de Wever, in the news with his opposition to the EU “Loan to Ukraine” in all of it’s manipulations, is positioned by the same behind the scenes global and globalist “elites” to take over from Ursula as the bull-horn of the EU administrative slew.
A smart politician, smarter intellectually then Ursula, but thus also a “smarter” manipulator. Ursula will take the golden chute, de Wever will shine. The man is all politics, in on all opportunistic currents, but then only that. I predict that Bart de Wever alas “Bartje, Fritkot de Wever” is the man, spot on, place and time. The proles and middle class dwellers will eat it, the controlled opposition can posit his “ethical” stance on Ukraine, and he is a proven henchman for the international banking elites. There simply is no downside to him, the timing, the need. A case of rare constellation.
My stance: if Gilbert Doctorow takes the bait, then what can happen to this man of the moment.
Datagram:
Posted:Thu,04.12.2025
Author:m.
Keywords:strategy
Link:Roger Boyd from Geopolitics And Climate Change
“The US Strategy Is Becoming Clearer & Clearer” —Roger Boyd, does it? My take: the US strategy is tagged as such: Trump, and US, while it is behind the scenes the international banker elites —including these of Russia and more importantly Israel— that have a “strategy” of proxies, low level conflict, globally, —amazing Syria, Libanon, Iran are not mentioned in a single breath with Ukraine. The loss of global power, over and along nodes of trade, manufactoring, corporate networks, science, finance are obvious since years. What is left is layers of proxies, and “sabotage” —if we cannot put up Macron, than this single word will do— that is about all there is on strategy.
An immediate loser: the Western European prole and middle class, as an alternative to eating out the Russia target, they now are cannibalized. The visible elites of Western Europe seem to have gotten a “Too high to fail” notice and a “golden parachute” deal. Roger Boyd newsletter is on to the same thing, …only the US —which is simply another proxy as a nation— misnomer is of.
…from what i see, the banking elites are still in the game, and a Putin boost even put them slightly ahead in the “quest for what is left”(my take), up unto the end of this century.
Datagram:
Posted:Wed,03.12.2025
Author:m.
Keywords:anomaly,Aurelien,Substack,
Putin(interpreted): “Ukraine’s Zelensky is not legitimate”, which can be seen as a “legitimate”, repeated remark by Mr. Putin.
…then receiving Witkoff Stevie[1], where is this man’s status(as compared to Zelensky’s) as legit negotiator grounded within the US administrative system. It looks like the only explanatory grounding is the “family is everything, made men” of Mr. Trump. Why does Putin play along? Is this adding to his credibility? Is this “Real-Politics”?
…my concern is that playing along such lines will make for expanding venues in all directions, the sophistication of the Witkoff individual(if so) being the credential, the opportunism of Putin, narrowing his credibility. Yarvin Curtis, Peter Thiel seem to encourage such pathways.